Class 3 Flight Review Process
A Class 3 rocket is defined as any amateur rocket propelled by a motor (or motors) totaling more than 40,960 Newton-seconds (a “P” motor or greater). The Class 3 Review Committee performs reviews of rockets which will be flown at a Tripoli Launch and which are either Tripoli Member Class 3 flights to be submitted to the FAA AST for app
roval, or projected to an altitude of over 100,000', regardless of total impulse.
For 2020, the Board asked the Committee to perform additional reviews of flights submitted, in an effort to improve the rate of successful, safe recovery of projects reviewed by the Committee. This has entailed developing a new, more detailed submission form, as well as identifying a small group of experienced fliers who will review every submission. Flights that this group does not feel are likely to properly deploy a safe recovery system will not be passed on to the analysis phase and will instead be declined, and the flier notified with the opportunity to rectify deficiencies.
Failure to submit a fully documented project as defined by the Class 3 Submission Form will also be rejected. It is incumbent upon the flier to provide all information requested on the form, as well as the required simulations and motor files.
For 2021, the Board mandated a maximum recovery rate of 35 feet per second (fps). Any project with a projected recovery speed of more than 35 fps must have BoD approval
prior to submission to the C3RC.
Members are reminded that ALL Class 3 projects requiring review by the Class 3 Committee require dual fully redundant deployment electronics. Tilt inhibit is also mandatory for projects involving multiple stages. Projects that do not meet these requirements will not be reviewed by the Class 3 committee nor receive approval by the TRA BOD for flight.
Because the Committee may have questions based on the packet submitted, fliers are strongly encouraged to submit at least two weeks in advance of the 90 day deadline. Failure to provide time for questions to be addressed may result in denial of advancement to the analysis phase.
In addition, it is important to remember that a review by the Class 3 Review Committee does not grant permission, or approval for flight. The decision for whether or not the flight can be made is up to the RSO and Launch Director at the launch. Fliers are strongly encouraged to contact the Launch Director in advance.
Beginning 2025, projects that meet the criteria to require submission to the Class 3 Committee may only be flown at launches sanctioned and run by a Prefecture. An individual or group may not host their own launch for a project that requires review by the Class 3 Review Committee.
All flights reviewed by the C3RC require a post-flight summary to the Committee on the success/failure of the flight. The summary must be received by the last day of November of the year of the flight. Failure to provide a post-flight summary will result in the C3RC denying reviews for the flier for the next 3 years.
The post-flight summary must contain:
- For all flights
- Altitude reached
- Recovery coordinates
- Whether or not the flight was successful, with "successful" requiring a nominal recovery
- If the flight was not successful
- Failure mode
- Information available on cause of failure